Snohomish County, WA, prosecutors personal meetings with judges to fix cases

A few months ago, the Gold Bar Reporter reported on the same prosecutor, Joseph Genster, fixing cases with US Federal Judge Ricardo Martinez, in the following story,

Snohomish County Prosecutor has direct line to US Federal Court Judge

A couple of months ago, we noticed that someone from Mercedes, Texas came onto the Gold Bar Reporter at the exact same time, looking at the same articles, as someone from Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office.

A few years ago, we started researching several judges, including United State Federal District Court, Seattle, Ricardo Martinez, and noticed that he still has family in Mercedes Texas.

What should be noted is that the Gold Bar Reporter has two pending lawsuits in Western Washington Federal District Court, Seattle Division.  Judge Ricardo Martinez has self assigned himself to each and every case involving Gold Bar Reporter Anne Block.

Anne Block is not the only litigant suing the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) that Judge Ricardo Martinez has self assigned himself to, Attorney Steve Eugster sued the WSBA, and Judge Martinez also self assigned himself to his case.

Noticing Mercedes Texas and Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office on the Gold Bar Reporter on the same day at the same time, looking at exactly the same article, these facts resulted in a public records request to Snohomish County government seeking three prosecutors’ telephone records, Joseph Genster, Jason Cummings,  and Snohomish County’s newest racketeering thug, Adam Cornell.

We really didn’t believe that we’d get anything. But we did – and our hunch was correct, Judge Ricardo Martinez and Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office has been engaging in direct exparte communication.

Judge Martinez’s telephone number is 206-370-8999 and is posted below.  

Click to see Snohomish County Prosecutor Joseph Genster and US Federal Court Judge Ricardo Martinez’s caught in exparte communication.caputured in public records.

Judge Ricardo Martinez even left a two minute voice message that the County has refused to turned over.  Why,  can best be explained as major corruption i.e case fixing and exparte communication.  As such, Snohomish County was notified that a lawsuit will be filed forcing disclosure of our telephone records.

Why hasn’t the Chief Judge of the 9th Circuit, Judge Sidney Thomas, investigated US Federal Court Judge Ricardo Martinez for corruption?

___________________________________________________________________________

Now, public records also confirm Snohomish County Prosecutor Joseph Genster is once again caught via public records having exparte meetings with Judge Fair, a judge inside Snohomish County District Court who has been assigned to maliciously prosecute another reporter

Douglas Fair, Snohomish County District Court, public records confirm Judge having exparte meetings with County Prosecutor Joseph Genster, who according to our counsel violates the Separation of Powers Doctrine.

Click on the audio below received via RCW 42.56, seeking all of Snohomish County Prosecutor Joseph Genster’s telephone messages and text messages

______________________________________________________________________________

Separation of powers is a political doctrine originating in the writings of Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws, in which he argued for a constitutional government with three separate branches, each of which would have defined abilities to check the powers of the others. This philosophy heavily influenced the writing of the United States Constitution, according to which the LegislativeExecutive, and Judicial branches of the United States government are kept distinct in order to prevent abuse of power. This United States form of separation of powers is associated with a system of checks and balances.

Source Wikipedia

Comments

  1. It never ceases to amaze me how these “public servants” seem to think they are somehow exempt or above the law….why hasn’t the mainstream media reported on this? Why is Judge Martinez “self assigned” to any case? He must be a “retired” judge..which begs the question if he is in fact an actual Article III judge. Scott Stafne was litigating on this issue – whether “retired” judges were actually Article III judges – seems there is enough question here to require recusal…and as for the ex parte communication… our esteemed Supreme Court should be intervening and disciplinary action should ensue.. . disgusting behavior abounds still in the Sno Co PA office….

    Like

    • In each every case where the WSBA is sued, Ricardo ” Corrupt” Martinez has self assigned himself. Martinez never disclosed he was a Special Assistant Attorney General (SAAG), and he was also a major contractor for Association of Washington Cities (AWC). What this means is simple, he was required to disclose and recuse himself from hearing any cases involving the WSBA ( which we now know being operated by the WA AG’s Office, in my opinion unlawfully because the WA Bar is a private association), and as a contractor for AWC, Martinez had no business on any case in WA State that involves an agency. So far I have counted 2220 cases that Martinez has no business on, but did in fact make decisions in favor – at 100 %- of the agency. He did this without disclosing his pecuniary, professional and personal relationship to the WA AG and AWC.

      Like

Trackbacks

  1. […]       Switch to draftPreview(opens in a new tab)Update                 Add […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: